Features, pricing, and head-to-head comparison
Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps us keep StackPick free. Our editorial process is independent.
| Make | Activepieces | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| Category | Automation | Automation |
| Feature | Make | Activepieces |
|---|---|---|
| API access | ||
| App integrations (1000+) | 200+ | |
| Conditional logic (if/then) | ||
| Data transformation | ||
| Error handling | ||
| HTTP requests | ||
| Multi-step workflows | ||
| Scheduling (cron) | ||
| Self-hosting option | ||
| Team collaboration | ||
| Version history | ||
| Visual workflow builder | ||
| Webhooks |
1
$9/mo billed yearly
Unlimited
$16/mo billed yearly
Unlimited
1
Unlimited
$10/mo billed yearly
1
Make and Activepieces have similar entry pricing, so compare paid-tier limits before deciding.
Activepieces shows more unique supported features in this dataset.
Run a pilot with your top option before full migration. Implementation risk is often bigger than subscription cost.
No clearly unique supported features in this dataset.
Try MakeFree plan
Try MakeTry ActivepiecesFree plan
Try ActivepiecesGet alerts when Make or Activepieces change their pricing - no account needed.
Based on current scoring, Make has the higher score (4.7/5 vs 4.7/5). The right choice still depends on your workflow and budget constraints.
Both offer free plans. Always validate seat-based pricing at your team size.
Yes. Teams switch between Make and Activepieces regularly. Start with a pilot migration and validate import/export coverage before full rollout.